Screen resolution 1920x1080 not available

SCREEN RESOLUTION 1920X1080 NOT AVAILABLE INSTALL
SCREEN RESOLUTION 1920X1080 NOT AVAILABLE DRIVER
SCREEN RESOLUTION 1920X1080 NOT AVAILABLE WINDOWS 10

If I use Chrome developer tools and play around with the width of the responsive viewport, text size isnвЂ™t increasing or decreasing. This is where the problem arises - to my knowledge, text sizes should not scale proportionally like this, right? We can either:ДЄ) View it at 100% of the original size (since weвЂ™re viewing this on a 1440px wide screen, we would need to scroll horizontally in order to view the entire design, so this is not ideal)Д«) Scale it down to fit our screen size, which means the entire design is scaled proportionally to suit our 1440px. In contrast, letвЂ™s say we design a responsive layout on a 1920px wide frame in Figma, then view it in prototype mode on a 1440px wide screen. So when a browser window is resized, although elements will move around, it should not affect the text size.

This is similar to what we do when we set our constraints in Figma. I could be wrong, and would gladly be corrected, but from my understanding real, coded web pages should behave responsively as a browser window is resized, they should not scale up or down proportionally. Not sure if IвЂ™ve missed something here, but this is still a problem. However, if I view the prototype and play around with the size of the browser window, it doesnвЂ™t act in the same way. In Figma, I can play around with the frame size, and it will act in a responsive way. ItвЂ™d be great if, when users are viewing the prototype in the browser, the design would behave in align with the responsive design youвЂ™ve built. HOWEVER, this means I have to change the size of each frame, and if youвЂ™re working with a prototype with lots of frames, this would take forever. This solves half the problem - if a customer asks to see the design in a different desktop size, I can simple resize the frame, and it will change in a responsive way, and there wonвЂ™t be any fiddling around to do. I always take responsiveness into consideration, but I rarely took the time to properly set my constraints and grids, as I rarely had to demonstrate with my prototypes how the responsiveness would work. Select 1920 x 1080 and save the changes.Thanks for the response, IвЂ™ve somehwat discovered a solution to this as I went down the rabbit hole of grids and responsive design. In here you should see the previously created custom resolution.Switch back to the Adapter tab and click List All Modes button.In the Display Adaptor PropertiesВ window click on Monitor tab, uncheck Hide modes that this monitor cannot display box, and click Apply.Now go to Windows Settings > System > Display, click on Advanced Display Settings and then Display Adaptor Properties for Display1.

Display > Custom Resolutions add a new 1920x1080, 32bit, 60Hz resolution.

Right click on the Desktop > Graphics Properties.

SCREEN RESOLUTION 1920X1080 NOT AVAILABLE DRIVER

This driver didn't resolve the actual issue, but luckily it supports custom resolutions which allowed for the following workaround:

SCREEN RESOLUTION 1920X1080 NOT AVAILABLE INSTALL

This was actually not even the latest version of this driver available from Intel, but the latest oneВ wouldn't install at all.

SCREEN RESOLUTION 1920X1080 NOT AVAILABLE WINDOWS 10

The chipset is too old for any official Windows 10 support, but after some experimenting, I found that a Windows 7 / Vista version ( Win7Vista_64_151719) that successfully upgraded the native Windows 10 graphics driver (I also saved a copy here in case Intel pulls it from it' website). First of all, I tried to find a suitable Intel Graphics Media AcceleratorВ driver for this chipset that would work in Windows 10.

Screen resolution 1920x1080 not available